NATO’s attack on hijacked Afghan oil tankers may have hit civilians

Read a little. Learn a lot. • Tightly-written news, views and stuff • Follow us on Twitter • Be a Facebook Fan • Tumble us!

Posted on September 4, 2009 | tags

Older: American Apparel’s Dov Charney very sad about immigrant layoffs

Newer: Nutjobs afraid Obama might brainwash kids with school speech

Older in World: Japan’s new first lady is a little bit spacier than Michelle Obama

Newer in World: An over-its-weight-limit tourist boat in Macedonia sinks

Posted by Ernie Smith • Permalink

davefillmore

If there is no evidence to prove the intentional killing of innocent civilians, it is my belief that the primary objective of US military combat personnel in Afghanistan should be to kill the enemy, wherever and whenever they can. Unfortunately, many times innocent Afghani civilians are killed (collateral damage) in the process, as was the case in the oil tanker strike.
davefillmore

If there is no evidence to prove the intentional killing of innocent civilians, it is my belief that the primary objective of US military combat personnel in Afghanistan should be to kill the enemy, wherever and whenever they can. Unfortunately, many times innocent Afghani civilians are killed (collateral damage) in the process, as was the case in the oil tanker strike.