<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lame: Apple’s trying to block hacked Macs from its architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shortformblog.com/tech/lame-apples-trying-to-block-hacked-macs-from-its-architecture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shortformblog.com/tech/lame-apples-trying-to-block-hacked-macs-from-its-architecture/</link>
	<description>Read a little. Learn a lot.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:05:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shortformblog</title>
		<link>http://shortformblog.com/tech/lame-apples-trying-to-block-hacked-macs-from-its-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-6793</link>
		<dc:creator>shortformblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shortformblog.com/?p=17231#comment-6793</guid>
		<description>This is true, but straight-up blocking an entire chipset years after people were using it for that functionality? That seems kind of petty. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They&#039;re already not getting support from Apple for the FrankenMacs. This just seems like a step too far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is true, but straight-up blocking an entire chipset years after people were using it for that functionality? That seems kind of petty. </p>
<p>They’re already not getting support from Apple for the FrankenMacs. This just seems like a step too far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: texasbrian</title>
		<link>http://shortformblog.com/tech/lame-apples-trying-to-block-hacked-macs-from-its-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-6792</link>
		<dc:creator>texasbrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 21:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shortformblog.com/?p=17231#comment-6792</guid>
		<description>Why is that &quot;lame&quot;? Apple has always (except for two non-Jobs years) has a similar EULA policy. Don&#039;t hack. If you do, hack at your own peril.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is that “lame”? Apple has always (except for two non-Jobs years) has a similar EULA policy. Don’t hack. If you do, hack at your own peril.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shortformblog</title>
		<link>http://shortformblog.com/tech/lame-apples-trying-to-block-hacked-macs-from-its-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-4803</link>
		<dc:creator>shortformblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shortformblog.com/?p=17231#comment-4803</guid>
		<description>This is true, but straight-up blocking an entire chipset years after people were using it for that functionality? That seems kind of petty. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They&#039;re already not getting support from Apple for the FrankenMacs. This just seems like a step too far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is true, but straight-up blocking an entire chipset years after people were using it for that functionality? That seems kind of petty. </p>
<p>They’re already not getting support from Apple for the FrankenMacs. This just seems like a step too far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: texasbrian</title>
		<link>http://shortformblog.com/tech/lame-apples-trying-to-block-hacked-macs-from-its-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-4802</link>
		<dc:creator>texasbrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shortformblog.com/?p=17231#comment-4802</guid>
		<description>Why is that &quot;lame&quot;? Apple has always (except for two non-Jobs years) has a similar EULA policy. Don&#039;t hack. If you do, hack at your own peril.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is that “lame”? Apple has always (except for two non-Jobs years) has a similar EULA policy. Don’t hack. If you do, hack at your own peril.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

