Comparing apples to apples: Woolworths vs. … um, Apple

Read a little. Learn a lot. • Tightly-written news, views and stuff • Follow us on Twitter • Be a Facebook Fan • Tumble us!

Posted on October 5, 2009 | tags

Older: Black holes and revelations: Muse tells Glenn Beck no thanks

Newer: Take with grain of salt: Are huge midterm GOP gains possible?

Older in Tech: This is what happens when you put Digg’s Kevin Rose on the spot

Newer in Tech: Nobel Prize people: Your life’s work worth $1.4 million

Woolworths apple Looks like a worm has already gotten to it, based on its loopy shape. It’s got a firm kind of plastic, which tells you that the apple is genetically modified. Is the subject of a scary lawsuit from the Apple on the right.
Bad apple Brown, a little shady on the inside. Makes you want to not eat it. We wanted to get a nice apple, but we were in a hurry this morning so we grabbed the very first apple off the tree we could find. Good enough for our purposes.
Apple logoNot very organic. Made of chrome. Probably tough to bite into. Probably a few transistors in there somewhere. Was sued heavily by a much more musical Apple back in the day, and is now paying it forward. Good job. source

Posted by Ernie Smith • Permalink

dreciferous

I’m all for intellectual property and the like, but I think someone should be able to have an apple in their freaking business logo! You shouldn’t be able to copyright APPLES! or the word “WHAT” or anything else so effing common.
dreciferous

I’m all for intellectual property and the like, but I think someone should be able to have an apple in their freaking business logo! You shouldn’t be able to copyright APPLES! or the word “WHAT” or anything else so effing common.