teases: on • reblogs: on

ShortFormBlog

Read a little. Learn a lot. • Ask Us Stuff!FAQArchiveTimeline

Tagged: seo

Our best freaking stuff right now:

January 23, 2013
12:14 • 4 months ago

jimmydaly:

Here’s what happened. The Verge wrote this great feature and The Huffington Post “curated” it. Editor-in-Chief of The Verge was not pleased.

Matthew Ingram of GigaOm jumped in to ask this very important question:

Huffpo’s one-paragraph pull of a much longer Verge piece full of graphics, visuals and well-considered content doesn’t take away from a transformative original piece. The question is, do people click the link on HuffPo and realize that there’s a much better transformative piece out there?

February 24, 2012
23:51 • 1 year ago

metamorphoseandbodhi asks: What’s the point of the fame? Do they get paid?

» SFB says: Yeah, they do. As the clip notes, Gaitan or others can earn hundreds or thousands of dollars for a video that’s well-placed and receives a lot of views. It’s a get-rich-quick scheme in some ways, but one that seems to be effective. And some of the clips can link to affiliate sites, boosting their income in other ways. The “fame” is actually somewhat questionable in nature, as their videos often get many dislikes. The phenomenon is super-fascinating either way. — Ernie @ SFB

February 13, 2012
10:54 • 1 year ago
January 3, 2012
22:28 • 1 year ago
While Google did not authorize this campaign, and we can find no remaining violations of our webmaster guidelines, we believe Google should be held to a higher standard, so we have taken stricter action than we would against a typical site.
Google, talking about itself in the third person regarding a pay-per-link scandal involving its own Google Chrome browser. Google punished itself by lowering the browser’s search ranking unser the term “browser” for 60 days. Excuse us while we slap our own hand on the wrist just to see how it feels.
October 19, 2011
11:23 • 1 year ago

A follow-up to our Tumblr likespam post from last night: One of the things pointed out to us by one of our readers, Paulo Ordoveza, is that the blank profiles also have a payload, although it’s not obvious (we initially said the blank profiles were merely holding spots for future backlinking). We just did a check of the source code on one, and here’s what we found. Click with care, guys.

02:06 • 1 year ago
fearandwar asks: What good are backlinks? Like, how do spammers use them?

» SFB says: Backlinks, essentially, give certain sites an advantage by building up content, raising a site’s Google ranking by increasing the number of places it’s linked. There are two types of SEO: white-hat (produced by good design and good practices) and black-hat (not approved or intended by search engines). Creating a bunch of backlinks through unrelated Web sites (like what’s happening on Tumblr) or through sites with little content is one example of black-hat SEO. And, despite the name, even big companies use black-hat techniques. JC Penney, for example, got nailed by the New York Times earlier this year for their sketchy backlinking techniques. — Ernie @ SFB

Follow us on Facebook:
01:39 • 1 year ago

A suggestion for Tumblr: Try to figure out a way so spammers can’t use this black-hat SEO (search engine optimization) technique. It’s dead simple to take advantage of, and as a result, some sites (such as our own) often drown in it. Today, for example, we got a ton of fake traffic from bots doing an obscure search on Google (see screenshots). Here’s a quick explanation as to what’s happening, as far as we can see:

  • first Black hat SEO types hit Google and type in this specific phrase — “site:tumblr.com ‘liked this’” — a common phrase on Tumblr due to the way it handles likes. 
  • then Then, sketchy bot types will create hundreds or thousands of fake Tumblr accounts whose URLs forward to a sketchy-looking site not on Tumblr.
  • result These sites end up getting hundreds or thousands of backlinks to their sketchy sites on Google — and all they had to do was like tons of people.

» But we have a temporary solution: Are you, like us, getting a lot of spam on your Tumblr? This is a likely reason. We’d like to offer a suggestion to solve the problem. If you know how to edit your theme in HTML, do a search for the phrase “{PostNotes}” and replace it with this: ”<!—googleoff: all—>{PostNotes}<!—googleon: all—>”. This prevents the notes from getting crawled by Google, which is good because it focuses your content, but bad, because any relevant content in reblogs won’t account for what shows up in search engines. This is really a problem Tumblr needs to look at — if they take out common phrases or make them invisible to search engines, everyone wins. But we hope this at least helps your sanity. It’ll help ours.

July 24, 2011
16:39 • 1 year ago
May 13, 2011
14:19 • 2 years ago
So, Twitter&#8217;s having stability issues today. Like clockwork, here&#8217;s the obvious HuffPo SEO grab, ensuring Arianna&#8217;s empire can afford to further not pay its bloggers.

So, Twitter’s having stability issues today. Like clockwork, here’s the obvious HuffPo SEO grab, ensuring Arianna’s empire can afford to further not pay its bloggers.

May 4, 2011
22:41 • 2 years ago

parislemon:

The information in the image above is not surprising at all. But still pathetic.

Imagine that, you write 35 200-word posts featuring the words “Bin Laden” in the headline and they pull in traffic on the day it’s one of the most searched terms ever

Were any of those stories really about technology? A few, maybe. But none were given the actual attention that a story of such magnitude deserves. It was a pure traffic/SEO play.

Read More

Mashable’s articles make us uncomfortable too. We post a lot of short stuff over here, so we’d like to make a separation. This piece really says a lot about how SEO can trump everything sometimes. Even morals. It’s one thing to find a new article that nobody has seen yet. It’s another to do the blatant SEO grabs that Mashable does. “Bin Laden Big on Social Media.” No, really? Why don’t you find out what’s actually happening?

Recent posts and stuff we dig:
May 2, 2011
13:08 • 2 years ago

  • cause Whenever a story comes out of nowhere to be a major news story — say, Japan’s earthquake or Osama bin Laden’s death — it tends to draw a lot of search traffic overnight to new terms that come up based on the story.
  • effect Now that anything Bin Laden-related is SEO platinum, malware creators are using the opportunity to load your computer with a virus — using such mechanisms as Google Image Search. Be careful out there, guys. source

April 27, 2011
20:47 • 2 years ago
It also looks like [Zephoria] is calling up other social media services to try to take over my account. I’m still investigating all of this but not at all surprised. Apparently, they’re a SEO company. And apparently my social media usage affects their SEO. Le sigh.
Danah Boyd • Getting at the key problem here with her whole Tumblr username takeover. While there’s reason for Tumblr to get a little bit of the stinkeye over this issue (although they’re working like crazy to make amends in this case, with Tumblr CEO David Karp himself doing customer service), Zephoria the company appears to be doing really sketchy things in an attempt to usurp Boyd’s longstanding online identity. Because, you know, Boyd has a Twitter account with many users, a YouTube account since 2006, a Flickr account since 2004, a Last.fm account since 2004 … you get the idea. So, instead of  going after Tumblr, we think the Zephoria company itself deserves scrutiny, based on their apparent piggyback on Boyd’s name. While they may have an A+ Better Business Bureau rating, if Boyd’s right, that should probably go down to a B-minus. source (viafollow)
February 17, 2011
19:27 • 2 years ago
Huffington Post uses word &#8220;Google&#8221; 103 times in single article
The article of the moment on HuffPo: Personally, we prefer to Bing Google on Bing. What an obvious grab for SEO! The article says Google 103 times (by our count)! But seriously, folks, we Lycos this article and think it&#8217;s pretty Cuil. source
Follow ShortFormBlog

The article of the moment on HuffPo: Personally, we prefer to Bing Google on Bing. What an obvious grab for SEO! The article says Google 103 times (by our count)! But seriously, folks, we Lycos this article and think it’s pretty Cuil. source

Follow ShortFormBlog

December 2, 2010
10:32 • 2 years ago

  • evil An online store called DecorMyEyes.com used negative feedback about itself to boost its own SEO rankings on Google. It encouraged it, even.
  • dumb The site agrees to talk to The New York Times, creating such bad PR that we can ensure nobody will ever shop there ever again. Great work, NYT.
  • smart Google then changed its algorithm, saying ”being bad is, and hopefully will always be, bad for business in Google’s search results.” source

More posts:

 

ShortFormBlog is the product of Ernie Smith, Seth Millstein, Chris Tognotti, Sami Main, Scott Craft, Matthew Keys, Julius the laid-off RSS robot, awesome links from awesome sources, a hacked version of Wordpress, Tumblr's Tumblarity, the letter Q, the number 13 and a series of tubes.

Copyright 2009-2013 Ernie SmithAsk us stuff!E-mail usFollow us on TwitterFollow us on Facebook

    TwitterCounter for @shortformblog   Real Time Web Analytics   Creative Commons License Real Time Web Analytics