Here’s what happened. The Verge wrote this great feature and The Huffington Post “curated” it. Editor-in-Chief of The Verge was not pleased.
Formal public request. @bbosker and @huffingtonpost, please remove the content you’ve scraped from us. huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/21/the… Seriously.
— Joshua Topolsky (@joshuatopolsky) January 23, 2013What’s most egregious about this @huffingtonpost scrape is its theft of our SEO on title and text. Google “death of the american arcade”
— Joshua Topolsky (@joshuatopolsky) January 23, 2013@joshuatopolsky that was a story we linked out to on huffpost to drive traffic/readers to The Verge, which it looks like it did 1/2
— Bianca Bosker (@bbosker) January 23, 2013@bbosker no it didn’t.
Matthew Ingram of GigaOm jumped in to ask this very important question:
@joshuatopolsky: so if Google gives the HuffPo excerpt more prominence than the original Verge piece, is that Google’s fault or HuffPo’s?
Huffpo’s one-paragraph pull of a much longer Verge piece full of graphics, visuals and well-considered content doesn’t take away from a transformative original piece. The question is, do people click the link on HuffPo and realize that there’s a much better transformative piece out there?
While Google did not authorize this campaign, and we can find no remaining violations of our webmaster guidelines, we believe Google should be held to a higher standard, so we have taken stricter action than we would against a typical site.Google, talking about itself in the third person regarding a pay-per-link scandal involving its own Google Chrome browser. Google punished itself by lowering the browser’s search ranking unser the term “browser” for 60 days. Excuse us while we slap our own hand on the wrist just to see how it feels.
A follow-up to our Tumblr likespam post from last night: One of the things pointed out to us by one of our readers, Paulo Ordoveza, is that the blank profiles also have a payload, although it’s not obvious (we initially said the blank profiles were merely holding spots for future backlinking). We just did a check of the source code on one, and here’s what we found. Click with care, guys.
fearandwar asks: What good are backlinks? Like, how do spammers use them?
» SFB says: Backlinks, essentially, give certain sites an advantage by building up content, raising a site’s Google ranking by increasing the number of places it’s linked. There are two types of SEO: white-hat (produced by good design and good practices) and black-hat (not approved or intended by search engines). Creating a bunch of backlinks through unrelated Web sites (like what’s happening on Tumblr) or through sites with little content is one example of black-hat SEO. And, despite the name, even big companies use black-hat techniques. JC Penney, for example, got nailed by the New York Times earlier this year for their sketchy backlinking techniques. — Ernie @ SFB
A suggestion for Tumblr: Try to figure out a way so spammers can’t use this black-hat SEO (search engine optimization) technique. It’s dead simple to take advantage of, and as a result, some sites (such as our own) often drown in it. Today, for example, we got a ton of fake traffic from bots doing an obscure search on Google (see screenshots). Here’s a quick explanation as to what’s happening, as far as we can see:
» But we have a temporary solution: Are you, like us, getting a lot of spam on your Tumblr? This is a likely reason. We’d like to offer a suggestion to solve the problem. If you know how to edit your theme in HTML, do a search for the phrase “{PostNotes}” and replace it with this: ”<!—googleoff: all—>{PostNotes}<!—googleon: all—>”. This prevents the notes from getting crawled by Google, which is good because it focuses your content, but bad, because any relevant content in reblogs won’t account for what shows up in search engines. This is really a problem Tumblr needs to look at — if they take out common phrases or make them invisible to search engines, everyone wins. But we hope this at least helps your sanity. It’ll help ours.
Dear Tricia Fox: Don’t use a person’s death to offer up small-business-friendly advice like this: “But whether you are a pop star, a plumber or a business consultant, the same rules still apply: you are the product. And if that’s the case, you are going to need to take really good care for yourself if you want your business to succeed.” It’s crass SEO-hoarding. BAD HuffPo.
So, Twitter’s having stability issues today. Like clockwork, here’s the obvious HuffPo SEO grab, ensuring Arianna’s empire can afford to further not pay its bloggers.
The information in the image above is not surprising at all. But still pathetic.
Imagine that, you write 35 200-word posts featuring the words “Bin Laden” in the headline and they pull in traffic on the day it’s one of the most searched terms ever.
Were any of those stories really about technology? A few, maybe. But none were given the actual attention that a story of such magnitude deserves. It was a pure traffic/SEO play.
Mashable’s articles make us uncomfortable too. We post a lot of short stuff over here, so we’d like to make a separation. This piece really says a lot about how SEO can trump everything sometimes. Even morals. It’s one thing to find a new article that nobody has seen yet. It’s another to do the blatant SEO grabs that Mashable does. “Bin Laden Big on Social Media.” No, really? Why don’t you find out what’s actually happening?
It also looks like [Zephoria] is calling up other social media services to try to take over my account. I’m still investigating all of this but not at all surprised. Apparently, they’re a SEO company. And apparently my social media usage affects their SEO. Le sigh.Danah Boyd • Getting at the key problem here with her whole Tumblr username takeover. While there’s reason for Tumblr to get a little bit of the stinkeye over this issue (although they’re working like crazy to make amends in this case, with Tumblr CEO David Karp himself doing customer service), Zephoria the company appears to be doing really sketchy things in an attempt to usurp Boyd’s longstanding online identity. Because, you know, Boyd has a Twitter account with many users, a YouTube account since 2006, a Flickr account since 2004, a Last.fm account since 2004 … you get the idea. So, instead of going after Tumblr, we think the Zephoria company itself deserves scrutiny, based on their apparent piggyback on Boyd’s name. While they may have an A+ Better Business Bureau rating, if Boyd’s right, that should probably go down to a B-minus. source (via • follow)
The article of the moment on HuffPo: Personally, we prefer to Bing Google on Bing. What an obvious grab for SEO! The article says Google 103 times (by our count)! But seriously, folks, we Lycos this article and think it’s pretty Cuil. source