Messed-up, for sure. Note graphic photos at the link. Here’s how the Times validated the photos.
» Sure to stir presidential emotions: The made-for-TV movie regarding the “rise of Sarah Palin” airs March 10. Though HBO claimed the movie is a “balanced portrayal” of events, Palin’s Super PAC has already labeled the movie “fact change.” Which may be true. ”Game Change” may have taken some dramatic liberties from the book, but you’ll be the judge of that.
You know, a “membership program,” like what you might enroll in at Costco: The cost of the Los Angeles Times’ paywall will translate to $1.99 for news consumers with a print subscription or $3.99 for readers without a print subscription, meaning digital-only access will cost around $16 for people who live outside of the LA Times’ print delivery footprint.
The LA Times will allow non-digital subscribers to read 15 articles within a 30-day period.
That’s roughly the same as the NYT, give or take a buck. By the way, this paywall is metered like their East Coast equivalent. Would you pay for the Times? (EDIT: The last post we had up about this topic was incorrect, and it’s $3.99 weekly, not monthly. Cheat Sheet, the original source of the article, flubbed it.)