The coolest place on the internet, according to this tagline.
AskArchiveFAQ

Slate’s French site names victim in Dominique Strauss-Kahn case
Did you guys know there was a French version of Slate? It’s true. And while it shares the same hue of purple as the mothership, it’s editorially independent and the Slate company owns a tiny 15 percent share of the product. Anyway, the site yesterday published an article noting the reported victim’s name in the Dominique Strauss-Kahn scandal (which we will not link directly here; if you’re interested, you can dig yourself) — a usual no-no in the world of journalism. And one that a few other outlets have also broken. But why Slate.fr, which carries the rep of a highly-regarded site that would never do something like that? According to an interview by The Atlantic Wire, the site’s founder, Eric Leser, says they did it to fight buck against the conspiracy theories that have grown around the story in France. “The story that we have published is proving that all of [these] theories are false,” he said. “That’s our main reason.” Do you guys agree with this stance? Do you think Slate.fr is making a mistake by publishing this? source
Follow ShortFormBlog

Did you guys know there was a French version of Slate? It’s true. And while it shares the same hue of purple as the mothership, it’s editorially independent and the Slate company owns a tiny 15 percent share of the product. Anyway, the site yesterday published an article noting the reported victim’s name in the Dominique Strauss-Kahn scandal (which we will not link directly here; if you’re interested, you can dig yourself) — a usual no-no in the world of journalism. And one that a few other outlets have also broken. But why Slate.fr, which carries the rep of a highly-regarded site that would never do something like that? According to an interview by The Atlantic Wire, the site’s founder, Eric Leser, says they did it to fight buck against the conspiracy theories that have grown around the story in France. “The story that we have published is proving that all of [these] theories are false,” he said. “That’s our main reason.” Do you guys agree with this stance? Do you think Slate.fr is making a mistake by publishing this? source

Follow ShortFormBlog

May 18, 2011 // 10:43 // 3 years ago
blog comments powered by Disqus

23 notes from really cool Tumblrs like ours. Click to read.

  1. anindiscriminatecollection reblogged this from hairtrending
  2. hairtrending reblogged this from shortformblog
  3. thewayofmei said: Usually victims names are not reported to protect the victim. Unless the victim gave permission, reporting the name is beyond wrong. I don’t think it dissolves any theories and just furthers the victimization.
  4. futurejournalismproject reblogged this from shortformblog
  5. shortformblog posted this