How do you guys feel about the way Obama just separated what happened in Iraq with what's happening in Libya?: ShortFormBlog

Adapted from Tumblr Related Posts by Dom Claxton

pantelism answered: The US imperial power is over-expanded can not play in another war. UK and France will do the dirty job and at the end down.will be both wr
arigeezay likes this
lateralsymmetry likes this
resurrecthobbes likes this
plausiblypragmatic answered: Obama makes a lot of references to the UN and coalition forces, attempting to shift the focus away from his swift use of unneccessary force.
tylhibari reblogged this from shortformblog
df-rico likes this
carpe-jvgvlvm answered: I think he’s right on the mark re: regime change being something we can AID initially but the Libyans are ultimately responsible for. (:
furaru answered: Obama’s address to Iraq was straight forward and needed to be said. The approach is completely different, with hopefully better results.
treatyoselfartie likes this
sundaymorningcomindown answered: It’s intellectually dishonest to associate the two on the same level. There is a distinct difference between invasion and intervention.
uhitsjayvee likes this
concretebeach answered: I don’t know. I mean, I guess he has to say it because then it would have looked like Iraq would have been freed eventually without us.
swagandpassion answered: Its a good way to separate 2 different approaches. Its a political statement since Iraq=Bush, but Libya can be a model of global intervention
shortformblog posted this

ShortFormBlog is the product of Ernie Smith, Seth Millstein, Chris Tognotti, Sami Main, Scott Craft, Matthew Keys, Julius the laid-off RSS robot, awesome links from awesome sources, a hacked version of Wordpress, Tumblr's Tumblarity, the letter Q, the number 13 and a series of tubes.