The coolest place on the internet, according to this tagline.

It’s one thing to have a bad study, a study full of error, and for the authors then to admit that they made errors. But in this case, we have a very different picture of what seems to be a deliberate attempt to create an impression that there was a link by falsifying the data.
British Medical Journal editor-in-chief Fiona Godlee • Explaining that the findings in an infamously retracted autism study in 1998 were not only false, but fraudulently made-up. BMJ claims that the Lancet study’s author, Andrew Wakefield, misrepresented or altered the histories of the twelve people used in the study. The result was a sharp drop in vaccinations, leading to a significant increase in measles cases in the ensuing years. Wakefield’s medical license was revoked las year as a result. He apparently received over $674,000 from a law firm that wanted to sue vaccine-makers, which was not made public until years after the study first came out. He does have some supporters who question the allegations, but if this is true, he’s an evil mother(#&@)!#. source (viafollow)
January 5, 2011 // 20:06 // 3 years ago
blog comments powered by Disqus

16 notes from really cool Tumblrs like ours. Click to read.

  1. firthofforth reblogged this from shortformblog
  2. ilyagerner said: vaccine-autism conspiracy theorists are the absolute worst.
  3. shortformblog posted this