<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What’s the upside to the White House’s “War on Fox News”?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shortformblog.com/chatter/whats-the-upside-to-the-white-houses-war-on-fox-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shortformblog.com/politics/whats-the-upside-to-the-white-houses-war-on-fox-news/</link>
	<description>Read a little. Learn a lot.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:05:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: terrence</title>
		<link>http://shortformblog.com/politics/whats-the-upside-to-the-white-houses-war-on-fox-news/comment-page-1/#comment-4772</link>
		<dc:creator>terrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 02:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shortformblog.com/?p=16841#comment-4772</guid>
		<description>http://www.lastingliberty.com today has a good article about this today: “Fox News Obama’s Only Friend”. The author makes a great point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lastingliberty.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.lastingliberty.com</a> today has a good article about this today: “Fox News Obama’s Only Friend”. The author makes a great point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NamelessCynic</title>
		<link>http://shortformblog.com/politics/whats-the-upside-to-the-white-houses-war-on-fox-news/comment-page-1/#comment-6893</link>
		<dc:creator>NamelessCynic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 23:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shortformblog.com/?p=16841#comment-6893</guid>
		<description>What exactly is Ms Jamieson&#039;s definition of a &quot;war,&quot; anyway? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The White House hasn&#039;t denied any of their reporters credentials, and hasn&#039;t tried to take Fox off the air. They just don&#039;t feel like sitting down and having to deflect massively spun questions, distortions and half-truths from what they&#039;ve rightly described as the propaganda wing of the GOP. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(And for all this current mania to say the White House is being &quot;nixonian&quot; lately, look up Roger Ailes&#039; background sometime.) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This &quot;war&quot; is entirely in the drug-addled mind of Rush Limbaugh and his ilk. The White House&#039;s &quot;attacks&quot; are to merely say &quot;nope - don&#039;t want to be interviewed by you.&quot; The remainder of their input is to explain this reasonable policy, when asked. It&#039;s Fox making the actual attacks. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, how is this a war? I&#039;m just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly is Ms Jamieson’s definition of a “war,” anyway? </p>
<p>The White House hasn’t denied any of their reporters credentials, and hasn’t tried to take Fox off the air. They just don’t feel like sitting down and having to deflect massively spun questions, distortions and half-truths from what they’ve rightly described as the propaganda wing of the GOP. </p>
<p>(And for all this current mania to say the White House is being “nixonian” lately, look up Roger Ailes’ background sometime.) </p>
<p>This “war” is entirely in the drug-addled mind of Rush Limbaugh and his ilk. The White House’s “attacks” are to merely say “nope — don’t want to be interviewed by you.” The remainder of their input is to explain this reasonable policy, when asked. It’s Fox making the actual attacks. </p>
<p>So, how is this a war? I’m just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NamelessCynic</title>
		<link>http://shortformblog.com/politics/whats-the-upside-to-the-white-houses-war-on-fox-news/comment-page-1/#comment-4761</link>
		<dc:creator>NamelessCynic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shortformblog.com/?p=16841#comment-4761</guid>
		<description>What exactly is Ms Jamieson&#039;s definition of a &quot;war,&quot; anyway? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The White House hasn&#039;t denied any of their reporters credentials, and hasn&#039;t tried to take Fox off the air. They just don&#039;t feel like sitting down and having to deflect massively spun questions, distortions and half-truths from what they&#039;ve rightly described as the propaganda wing of the GOP. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;(And for all this current mania to say the White House is being &quot;nixonian&quot; lately, look up Roger Ailes&#039; background sometime.) &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This &quot;war&quot; is entirely in the drug-addled mind of Rush Limbaugh and his ilk. The White House&#039;s &quot;attacks&quot; are to merely say &quot;nope - don&#039;t want to be interviewed by you.&quot; The remainder of their input is to explain this reasonable policy, when asked. It&#039;s Fox making the actual attacks. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So, how is this a war? I&#039;m just curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly is Ms Jamieson’s definition of a “war,” anyway? </p>
<p>The White House hasn’t denied any of their reporters credentials, and hasn’t tried to take Fox off the air. They just don’t feel like sitting down and having to deflect massively spun questions, distortions and half-truths from what they’ve rightly described as the propaganda wing of the GOP. </p>
<p>(And for all this current mania to say the White House is being “nixonian” lately, look up Roger Ailes’ background sometime.) </p>
<p>This “war” is entirely in the drug-addled mind of Rush Limbaugh and his ilk. The White House’s “attacks” are to merely say “nope — don’t want to be interviewed by you.” The remainder of their input is to explain this reasonable policy, when asked. It’s Fox making the actual attacks. </p>
<p>So, how is this a war? I’m just curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

